Evaluation criteria for applications
The table below lists the evaluation criteria for research and dissemination programs of the Faculty of Education. Please also refer to the University of Ottawa Research Grants and Ethics Services for further information on the Initiation to research and new directions (IRND) criteria and guidelines.
http://www.rges.uottawa.ca/grants/funding/internal/irnd.asp
NOTE: No project will be approved until outstanding reports of previous projects funded by the Faculty of Education have been received.
| Criteria |
Research |
Dissemination |
| Quality of proposal: purpose, procedures, rationale and relevance are clearly defined (for the researcher, and/or research team and for the Faculty of Education) | X |
X |
| Quality of the applicant's previous research and publication record Relevant information on the link between previous funding and productivity |
X |
X |
| Complete reference of the report of the last project funded by the
Faculty of Education (name of principal researcher, title of project,
length of project and date when the report was submitted) |
X |
X |
| Detailed budget justification: (when applicable) research assistant (specifying the tasks the student will be asked to perform and the necessary qualifications): please attach the completed S1 Form JOB DESCRIPTION - CUPE 2626; |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
| Link to education | X |
X |
| Extent and quality of the link with education | X |
X |
| Relationship of the proposal to the applicant's area of expertise. In the case of a team: the name, role and contribution of each member. | X |
X |
| Contribution to the training of graduate students (if applicable). | X |
X |
| Time line of activities and the anticipated outcomes clearly stated. | X |
X |
| Ethical clearance (if applicable). | X |
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR ALL PROGRAMS
Revised: 00 5 01 RESEARCH AND PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT FUNDS Faculty of Education |
||
NAME OF APPLICANT: _____________________________________ |
RESEARCH
1-5* |
RESEARCH
1-5* |
| QUALITY OF PROPOSAL: Purpose, procedures, rationale, and relevance are clearly defined (for the researcher, and/or research team and also for the Faculty of Education). | ||
| QUALITY OF THE APPLICANT'S PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION RECORD. | ||
DETAILED BUDGET JUSTIFICATION: (Research)
|
||
| RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSAL TO THE APPLICANTS’ AREA OF EXPERTISE In the case of a team: the name, role and contribution of each member. |
||
| CONTRIBUTION TO THE TRAINING OF GRADUATE STUDENTS | ||
| TIME LINE OF ACTIVITIES AND THE ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES CLEARLY STATED | ||
| PREVIOUS REPORT/S SUBMITTED YES___ NO___ N/A___ | ||
| A. EVIDENCE OF ETHICAL CLEARANCE (if applicable) YES___ NO___ N/A___ |
| B. PRIORITY 1) new scholar ___ 2) established researcher ___ 3) collaborative project ___ 4) joint funding ___ |
| C. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ______________________________________ |
| D. RECOMMANDATION : ACCEPTED FOR $ ________________ SUSPENDED CONDITIONAL FOR $________________ REFUSED
|
* 1=very weak, 5=excellent
